Google Marketing vs. Social Media Marketing

There seems to be this big debate over whether companies should be concentrating their marketing energy and resources on social media or good old fashioned organic search. This is a silly argument, because it assumes it is an either/or situation. Any marketer worth their salt will take the time to research the topic rather than just jump on a bandwagon. Think about it. We still have a decent sized section of the population that still uses the yellow pages. They are not going to skip Google and go straight to social media.

Google is the common denominator for everyone. Tech newbies all the way to veterans all use Google. Organic search marketing is still vital in today’s marketing world. People need to be able to find your company organically, because that is where they do cold searches first. Despite the surge of Twitter and Facebook, the front page of Google is still very important to your online presence.

This is not to put down social media. Services like Twitter can create a buzz for your company. So can Facebook and LinkedIn. Again, it must be done right and with your audience in mind. If your customer base happens to be ironic with how they approach the social media, putting a cheesy, earnest call to action is a mistake. However, being real and funny is more likely to attract people to your brand.

The title of this post is a misnomer. There really should not be a Google vs. Social Media mentality. It is not one or the other. It is one and the other. The sooner internet marketers do this, the better for their clients. Companies need to be seen in organic search in order to be found in the first place. Being found in social media creates a buzz around the brand.

Google+ Takes On Facebook

In just around 3 weeks, Google+ has raked in over 30 million users. It is remarkable when you think about it, because there is already a dominant social network, Facebook. Facebook has destroyed all comers, and does not look like they are slowing down. However, that may be where Google has seen their opening. Maybe some people are not excited about the prospect of their parents being their “friends” on Facebook. As one post on Reddit put it, It gives people a chance at a “do-over”.

This is also where I think there is likely to be a coexistence. People may end up using Facebook and Google+ in the same way they have been using Facebook and Twitter. Essentially, they share different things with different networks. Now, I’m certain Google has no desire to be just another network. I am sure they want to dominate Facebook. However, I don’t know that Facebook is going to suffer the same fate as MySpace. It has been too widely adopted, and is ingrained in the way people communicate. That doesn’t mean that Google won’t make an impact.

One major impact on Facebook is hopefully the user interface. Frankly, Facebook’s UI is atrocious. It is hard to find anything, and they change the way everything works quite a bit. Google+, on the other hand, has a very clean UI, and the “way it works” just seems more obvious. The Circles function is definitely one of the handiest. Being able to filter through your friends streams in a way that is similar to Twitter’s Lists is a big plus. This give you the ability to quickly read the things you actually want to.

One potential outcome may just be social media fatigue. In fact, I think that has probably already set in. Regardless, it is a good thing to have someone push Facebook. Being the dominant player in one area leads to complacency. Just ask Microsoft.

We’re Back!

I’m going to be blogging a lot about stuff related to technology, social media and the internet. Today, I’ll start off talking a little about social media and technology. Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook are the 3 services I use. I don’t think social media services would have exploded in popularity without smartphones becoming so popular.

Smartphones used to be the domain of business users only. Blackberry, while popular, wasn’t very consumer friendly with it’s clunky interface. Microsoft was attempting to make inroads, but their choice to cram a desktop OS into a phone made Windows Mobile virtually unusable. Palm, the pioneer of PDA’s, hadn’t updated their Treo OS in years, and it’s age was showing.

Then came the iPhone. It changed everything. Suddenly, accessing the internet on a mobile phone was fun and easy. The iPhone’s OS was elegant and easy to master. Afterwards, a slew of copycats and so-called “iPhone Killers” were released. Google eventually entered the fray with their Android mobile OS.

These newer phones gave smartphones more mass appeal, and developers eagerly created applications for the mobile devices. This made it easy for people to connect via Facebook or Twitter wherever they happened to be. Those services have since seen exponential growth. I don’t think we would have seen that without recent technological innovation.